Talk:Nick Carroll

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 September 2025. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Sports Low‑importance

	Australia portal Nick Carroll is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Large Language Model tag

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am proposing that the LLM tag can now be removed. The page does not "include hallucinated information or fictitious references." Nor does it contain "Copyright violations or claims lacking verification." Spinifex&Sand (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I agree. It looks more human. Robots aside, the WP:PROSELINE structure is not great: articles should be in formal paragraph structure, not a tedious list of one-sentence facts (and then he did this.. and then he did this.. and then... and then... and then...). --Animalparty! (talk) 01:07, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Large Language Model tag