Talk:New Tide
Add topicLatest comment: 8 months ago by HurricaneZeta in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from New Tide appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 December 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by HurricaneZeta (talk) 14:43, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- ... that New Tide was abandoned after many contributors left the country or joined the Chinese Literary Association?
- Source: "At the end of the year the society faded away, partly because most of the important members had gone abroad for study, and partly because some of them were busy founding the Society for Literary Studies." The May fourth movement : intellectual revolution in modern China https://archive.org/details/mayfourthmovemen0000zhou/page/56/mode/2up?q=%22Society+for+Literary+Studies%22
Created by Generalissima (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 4. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 130 past nominations.
Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 04:34, 8 November 2025 (UTC).
- I take.--Launchballer 06:58, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Long enough, new enough. All QPQs done; for future reference, adding closing and opening brackets to the Reviewed box (i.e. "Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Plagiolophus_(mammal)]], [[Template:Did you know nominations/Crow Country]], [[Template:Did you know nominations/Anglin Court]], [[Template:Did you know nominations/Rachel Walker Revere") would have saved you breaking into the Comment box. Earwig is clean. No reason why either would deserve a maintenance template and the hook checks out. Let's roll.--Launchballer 07:12, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
