Talk:Nero/GA1
Add topicLatest comment: 17 years ago by Rursus in topic GA Reassessment
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will do the GA Reassessment on this article as part of the GA Sweeps project. H1nkles (talk) 22:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
This is an excellent article. The writing is good, images are fine. There are two dead links, 26 and 152, but these are easily corrected. I note that there are several names that are linked many times. Suetonius, Tacitus, and Cassius Dio, are examples. I fixed some of these but due to the length of the article I won't go through each one. I also added some hard dashes (–) and non-breaking spaces per MOS. Overall the article is definitely GA. H1nkles (talk) 22:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, spontaneously I felt compelled to write a not of the excellency of this article, but since this is already a topic, I'll just add a note here. This article is very likable: it is not just well balanced and plausible, it is fascinating reading! ... said: Rursus (bork²) 09:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)