Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Neal Katyal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Ostip in topic Removing Milbank pro-bono paragraph

Untitled

[edit]

Over reaching bush administration? Does not sound NPOV to me.24.60.124.8 20:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

That's exactly what the Supreme Court held today, that the Bush Admin overreached in hamdan, merely a statement of fact. Bona Fides 20:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC) When the admin goes beyond its legal authority, that is an overreach. Bona Fides 13:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think that the list of his publications should be deleted, as it is a cut and paste from his CV on the Gtown website. Any thoughts?--Teutoberg 12:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think that it is way too long in comparison to the rest of the narrative. Someone familiar with the literature should list the important influential articles. Bona Fides 13:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think honors and awards should stay because they are typical of other biog stubs. Bona Fides 13:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think the long list of honors and awards made it seem like a promotional news relase. Webster1978 (talk) 12:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Acting Solicitor General

[edit]

This comment is applicable here and on the Solicitor General of the United States page. Kagan has stepped aside in her duties as Solicitor General, but still, as of today's date, the OSG official site says that Kagan is the Solicitor General. Certainly, Katyal is the acting Solicitor General, but should he be listed in the line of succession of Solicitors General, or if Kagan's nomination is not successful and she resumes the office?--Enos733 (talk) 06:16, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Work needed

[edit]

The article's lede reads like a pr piece (probably because it is, judging by the number of unattributed edits) and does not mention his primary activity, megafirm partner. By contrast, the "career" section is a mess. While this netbook attempts to download windows updates, I'm going to try to equalize the disparity, but screen size may prevent that.Jweaver28 (talk) 16:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

This article only mentions two specific items under'Political Positions', both Supreme Court nominations and present him as a seeming arch conservative, strange foe a Democrat and regular contributor to MSNBC. Cuchulain9 (talk) 00:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neal Katyal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

User:184.75.117.179's deletion

[edit]

Below is an IP User's deletion with an ES of just "not fair representation of position"; is this justified?

Katyal also spoke highly of President Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.[1] In multiple tweets that were cited by Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in favor of Kavanaugh's confirmation,[2] Katyal praised Kavanaugh's "credentials [and] hardworking nature,"[3] and described his "mentoring and guidance" of female law clerks as "a model for all of us in the legal profession."[4] Katyal has also described Kavanaugh as "very gracious"[5] and "incredibly likable."[6] “It’s very hard for anyone who has worked with him, appeared before him, to frankly say a bad word about him,” Katyal observed during a July 2018 panel on Kavanaugh's nomination sponsored by The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think-tank.[7]

X1\ (talk) 00:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

To add to article

[edit]

Basic information to add to this article (in order to help make it more properly encyclopedic): where in India his father and mother came from. 98.123.38.211 (talk) 04:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bibliography

[edit]

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:

  • Cite templates will be used where possible.
  • I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
  • Links (either direct or indirect) to potentially unreliable or incomplete digitised copies and to booksellers (including Wikipedia's ISBN links) may be removed.
  • A "Critical studies and reviews" section may be created instead of using inline references to reviews of the author's work.

This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 11:50, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

The edit that adds a paragraph about Katyal's involvement in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump cites an entire search on supremecourt.gov as it's sole source (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neal_Katyal&diff=prev&oldid=1339558429). This is not a source.

The quote attributed to him appears to be a tweet, not something that would have been included in any filing. Ostip (talk) 06:48, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Removing Milbank pro-bono paragraph

[edit]

I am removing the paragraph added here (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neal_Katyal&diff=prev&oldid=1286286294). Although he is a partner and leads their appellate practice, Katyal is only tangentially involved in this story and the article provides quotes from Scott Edelman, who is Milbank's chairman.

This addition would be appropriate on the Milbank article, not on this one. Ostip (talk) 07:16, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply