Talk:Nazi morality

@Luizpuodzius: Querendo traduzir é só falar. att 2804:14C:5BB3:8BED:9135:4048:DE8E:875F (talk) 09:18, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

It has been done (Foi feito) - AQUI Dr. Loo^{Talk to me} 19:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 9 February 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 22:40, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

---

Nazi morality → Nazi ethics – or fascist ethics– "Nazi ethics" has several advantages: it's more concise, it's consistent and it more fully defines the scope of the article. @Bearian and Luizpuodzius:. Mariana de moraes silveira (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Comment, on Google Scholar "nazi morality" gets 495 hits while "nazi ethics" gets 258 hits. I guess it's consistent with Islamic ethics, Christian ethics, Buddhist ethics, and Jewish ethics, but those are all religions. Kowal2701 (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Support. This is a more academic title and is therefore better for an encyclopedia article. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:04, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose the article and its sources are explicitly about morality, not ethics—these are not synonymous and one is not "more encyclopedic" than the other. (t · c) buIdhe 04:52, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
• marxist ethics and feminist ethics are enough? Mariana de moraes silveira (talk) 20:39, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

  @Buidhe, @Kowal2701, @Rreagan007 this was initiated by an LTA sock so should probably should be closed. S0091 (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.