Talk:Natural design

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Science Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of science

Untitled

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have probably violated a norm here because "The natural design perspective in psychology and biology" is pretty much my thing. I have tried to describe it neutrally, as it is a thing, out there in the literature. However, if I have blown my own horn inappropriately, here, please forgive me, and delete what I have written immediately. However, as you delete, would you also write me an email explaining how else I can bring "my thing" to the Wikipedia Community for connection to other similar things. Thank you. NickThompson@earthlink.net. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.154.202.119 (talk) 01:29, 7 November 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickthompson (talk • contribs) 01:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled