Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There are some problems with the article as currently written. First, there are no references cited to verify any statements in the article. Second, the article had a number of "weasel words", such as talking about how "many" attorneys and accountants felt a particular way about a subject with no documentation backing up the statement. Finally, the last paragraph of the article appeared to be significantly biased, and again made statements with no direct citations.
I therefore removed the final paragraph entirely, and revised the wording on other parts of the text to remove some of the "weasel" phrases. I also tagged the article for references. Hopefully they addresses some of the POV issues I saw and will spur someone to add some citations to verify the article's statements. Dugwiki21:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
I am not a legal expert, but there are some references out there that support the last paragraph. However, I agree with you that it needs to be reworded and cited.H.al-shawaf (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
