Talk:NPD ban proceedings
Add topicLatest comment: 11 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 23 July 2025
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 23 July 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from NPD-Ban Proceedings (2001-2003) to NPD ban proceedings. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 23 July 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. In this WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE situation, the closer must choose the best of the options provided, which is between "NPD ban proceedings" and "Proceedings to ban the National Democratic Party of Germany". Given that 3 editors support the first title the second title's 2 editors, I will be moving it to the original title proposed, NPD ban proceedings. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
NPD-Ban Proceedings (2001-2003) → NPD ban proceedings – Article titles should capitalize only the first word and proper nouns; range dash is en dash not hyphen; disambiguation part of the name is probably not necessary. Anomalocaris (talk) 21:50, 23 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 11:08, 31 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 05:01, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- Move to NPD ban proceedings: Article titles should be in sentence capitalization, and neither "ban" nor "proceedings" are proper nouns. There is no reason to hyphenate. Ranges should use the en dash (–), not hyphen (-). So the first correction would be to move to "NPD ban proceedings (2001–2003)", with a redirect from "NPD ban proceedings (2001-2003)" to the correct page. The next question is, have there been any other NPD ban proceedings? If not, the title should be simply "NPD ban proceedings". What do others think? —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:38, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- I am not active enough on the English Wikipedia to say whether or not there should be a hyphen, but to the second question, yes, there has been another attempt to ban the party (See NPD-Verbotsverfahren (2013–2017) – Wikipedia in the German Wikipedia). However, there isn't (yet) an article on this second attempt in English. --Valeee04 (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- Maybe Proceedings to ban NPD ? NPD ban proceedings could sound like NPD are proceeding... Should NPD be spelled out? Bit long, I know, but who would know what NPD means? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 20:53, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Done, but kept it plain. Probably bit soon. Sorry, I can always put it back? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:46, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Too soon. put it back — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:49, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Germany has been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 11:08, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- Move to Proceedings to ban the National Democratic Party of Germany * Pppery * it has begun... 22:32, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support alternative Proceedings to ban the National Democratic Party of Germany. A move is essential for many reasons. This is the best suggestion yet. Andrewa (talk) 01:39, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- I'd prefer NPD ban proceedings – Pppery's alternative is extremely long. However, for the purpose of finding consensus, I can accept the alternative as well. @Anomalocaris, in future it would be best if you first made a bold move to correct the obvious typographical issues (wrong dashes, wrong capitalization) before taking this to an RM to refine further; otherwise, we risk ending with no consensus to move, leaving us with an objectively incorrect title. Toadspike [Talk] 06:01, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks to Valeee04, we now know that in German Wikipedia, there are two articles: de:NPD-Verbotsverfahren (2001–2003) and de:NPD-Verbotsverfahren (2013–2017). The hyphen required by German grammar does not belong in English, so the two articles in English should be NPD ban proceedings (2001–2003) and NPD ban proceedings (2013–2017). As for Toadspike's thought that I should have been bold, I'm glad I waited for the discussion and for Valeee04 to share their knowledge. —Anomalocaris (talk) 18:47, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- instead of having two pages NPD ban proceedings (2001–2003) and NPD ban proceedings (2013–2017) there should just be one page for both proceedings. Muaza Husni (talk) 14:27, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.