Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:NOSA-ITACA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by MeComp2025 in topic How to improve the draft page ?

How to improve the draft page ?

[edit]

I created the page NOSA-ITACA, a free software for finite element structural analysis that is freely downloadable at its website. It seems to me that the page is written in neutral form with external references. In particular, the references I included consist of peer-reviewed scientific papers that describe the code in depth. Moreover, as articles published in scientific journals, they are reliable, independent, and secondary sources. Some of the cited papers are written by the Authors of the code and others are written by Authors not involved in the software development. I also included references in which the code is compared with similar software available in the literature, both commercial and open-access. Information reported in the page draft is verifiable and relies on published sources. Please help me to understand why the page does not satisfy the Wikipedia requirements. In the creation of my page I was inspired by other pages of Wikipedia describing similar packages, as Opensees, FreeFem++, Z88 FEM and so on. Please let me know your opinion, and suggestions are welcome MeComp2025 (talk) 10:55, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply