Talk:NATS Holdings

Advertising?

Links to a not particularly major software supplier added by an employee of that company don't seem relevant. I propose deleting this (or should we add links to all NATS' suppliers?) GTH1 (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Northern Oceanic Transition Area

The operations section should probably also mention NOTA. www.nats.co.uk/8050-9013/IAA-and-NATS-sign-letter-of-intent.html

Md84419 (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

line in introduction reads like advertisement

line "NATS aims to set standards in safety, service and value to their customers – the airlines." reads like an advertisement or directly from nats marketing - doesn't seem to add any value --Richlv (talk) 02:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Some structural changes needed

Suggests that the article is restructured so that it focusses on present time and not primary history.

The IAA/UK FAB actually changes the scene in a way that is not reflected in the text - enroute charges are required to unified for the complete FAB after at most 5 years from signature. Governance is no longer solely CAA but the FAB high level board.

The text needs an overhaul to be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcs45 (talk • contribs) 06:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Use of primary sources

@Cagliost, I placed the primary sources cleanup tag in the spirit of WP:PRIMARYNEWS as the sources referenced in "Notable incidents" didn't meet WP:SECONDARY requirements in my view, merely reporting news without any meaningful analysis. IMO, they're independent, but not secondary.

The tag was mostly regarding the references, rather than the article content. At least the last incident sounds like it'd eventually get the secondary non-news coverage that'd indicate it's significance in the context of NATS.

I don't understand the criteria that apply to including Eyjafjallajökull-related airspace closure though. What it has to do with NATS (other than they've been referenced by the news reports to confirm that the airspace was closed) and why is it included and dozens or hundredths of other restrictions NATS promulgates every month aren't?

Same concern regarding the "Associations and alliances with other organisations" section. PaulT2022 (talk) 16:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)