Talk:Mythodea/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Commencing GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 21:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   • Well written. Subject matter is presented in a developed fashion, using proper paragraphing. No fractured sentences.

   b (MoS):

   • Conforms to manual of style. Some unnecessary wikilinks, but I have removed these per WP:OVERLINK. Quotes should not be put in italics, so I have undone.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • Well referenced. References are accurate and links are active.

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • Citations are to a various array of sources.

   c (OR):

   • No evidence of OR.

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   • Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.

   b (focused):

   • Remains focused. No digressions.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   • No issues concerning POV evident.

5. It is stable:

   • No edit wars etc.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   • Images are properly tagged and justified.

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   • Images are accompanied by contextual captions.

7. Overall:

   Keep/Delist: KEEP ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 21:55, 14 February 2010 (UTC)