Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Mycin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Mycin is an knowledge based system

Problems

[edit]

Thank you for making it a stub, but the contributor has been making all sorts of odd entries today. We have deleted this once already. In any case, I predict vandalism. Or maybe not. --PaulinSaudi 14:06, 12 May 2004 (UTC)]]Reply

I predict copyvio because of this sentence, "A dialogue with Mycin is somewhat like the mini dialogue we gave in section 5.3..." it refers to a section 5.3 and I can not seem to find any such section in the article. --Jaberwocky6669 00:03, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
This article is copied word for word from http://www.cee.hw.ac.uk/~alison/ai3notes/section2_5_5.html, as the "source" link at the bottom of it suggests. Highly doubt that this is permissible - this appears to be one chapter from http://www.cee.hw.ac.uk/~alison/ai3notes/all.html "Databases and Artificial Intelligence 3 - Artificial Intelligence Segment" by Alison Cawsey, a lecturer in the School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences at Heriot Watt University. Recommend review. --RidG 02:41, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)


Usefulness

[edit]
"...and only slightly worse than those physicians who were themselves experts in the field (average correct diagnosis rate of about 80%)."

Surely a differential in recognition rates of 15% is not a "slight" difference? --86.139.39.232

Apparently it was. My guess is that it turned out to not be flexible enough, but nobody wanted to say so. --maru (talk) contribs 19:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


Comprehensibility

[edit]

Ok this article makes no sense to me, as a layman. I don't even understand what the article is describing. Is it some sort of computer system?? --Taco325i 13:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes. --maru (talk) contribs 19:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Evidence combination referencing

[edit]

Hi all the section on evidence combination is entirely based on reference 4. Should I have put the 4 in more places or is what I have done enough? EvilxFish (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sources

[edit]

Where are the sources to this article?

Most of the stuff here is without any reference. AvanRW (talk) 07:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: The Rhetoric of Archival Exploration

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 January 2025 and 22 March 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Editor go123 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Editor go123 (talk) 20:42, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Reply