Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Mountain View Corridor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by ~2025-41870-72 in topic Needs updated information

Debate

[edit]

See the current discussion on the updating/expansion of this article here. bob rulz (talk) 18:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Construction update: Utah County Spur

[edit]

I've been near the Utah County spur, where US-89 and I-15 come together. They have redone the interchange here, the ramps are set up differently and some further construction is ongoing to reconfigure the diamond interchange. However, no evidence of a freeway-to-freeway interchange being started has been seen. The traffic light was moved close to a quarter mile west, the road now curves south and they took out a sod business on the south side of US-89 to do so. A park-and-ride was also demolished, and the stoplight is to the north/west of and closer to the exit point off I-15. If going from northbound US-89 to either direction on I-15 you have to double back and go straight to go south or go under the freeway to go north.

No sign of a route number for this spur is given however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.23.140.50 (talk) 03:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

A freeway-to-freeway (system) interchange will be constructed at SR-85/I-15/US-89 at full build-out, in future phases. Phase one stipulates that an expressway be built first, with future phases upgrading the route to a freeway. However, that won't come for a while. As for the spur, the route number is just SR-85 as with the rest of the freeway, as indicated by signage on I-15 and signage on the 2100 North spur itself. I emailed UDOT about this and they can't seem to grasp that having the spur and the mainline roadway the same number is a little confusing. CL (T · C)21:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
I added a note that the spur will intersect SR-68. I don't know how we'll enter the exit numbers for the mainline and the spur; I guess we'll have to wait until build-out and see how UDOT numbers them. James L Hutchings (talk) 20:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

2100 North now SR-194

[edit]

Per the Online Highway Reference interactive map, the 2100 North segment is now SR-194. There isn't a reference PDF or a resolution yet.

Once those sources are out, what should happen with this article? Should a new page be created for the SR-194, or should that information be included in this page? Or should this page be deleted entirely and the information split between SR-85 and SR-194 articles? --Roadguy2 (talk) 00:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The mileage reference PDF for SR-194 is now online . As a result, I've gone ahead and created a draft page for SR-194 in my user space: User:Roadguy2/Utah State Route 194. --Roadguy2 (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Needs updated information

[edit]

https://www.heraldextra.com/news/2025/dec/08/mountain-view-corridor-freeway-connecting-utah-salt-lake-counties-to-open-dec-20/

There are other resources showing this too, but the connector piece from 2100 N to Porter Rockwell Blvd is now open. There are other news articles to. I would update the page, but I am not a good writer for encyclopedia entries. ~2025-41870-72 (talk) 19:34, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply