Talk:Mount Redoubt
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Bgsu98 in topic GA Reassessment
| Mount Redoubt has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 24, 2009. | |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article review
[edit]It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of uncited statements, especially about the 2009 eruption. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:46, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Issues appear to have been addressed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Lots of uncited statements, especially about the 2009 eruption. Z1720 (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720: I added details and cleaned up a bunch of uncited statements about the 2009 eruption. If there are other portions that need citations, could you mark them with {{cn}}? Otherwise, does it look good to you? — hike395 (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, Hike395. Happy to address any other concerns if there are any remaining. ceranthor 01:48, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Hike395 and Ceranthor: Sorry for the late reply. There is some information that is missing in the article that I would expect there, such as "Climate", Indigenous history near the mountain before colonisation (it's Native name is currently uncited) and information on its history post-2009. Are there any sources that could fill in the gaps? Some sources that might help are and . Z1720 (talk) 02:58, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720: Added information per your suggestions:
- Added "very high threat" to lede, per your first source.
- Added source for native name (GNIS)
- Added brief history of indigenous people
- Added geological history of volcano
- Added infrared warmth detection, per your second source.
- Added post-2009 eruptive history (only 2 events appeared to be documented/notable)
- Added a climate section
- I think this is definitely now in GA territory. What do you think? — hike395 (talk) 18:21, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720: Added information per your suggestions:
- Keep. No further concerns. Z1720 (talk) 18:30, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Geography and places good articles
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Volcanoes articles
- High-importance WikiProject Volcanoes articles
- All WikiProject Volcanoes pages
- GA-Class Alaska articles
- High-importance Alaska articles
- WikiProject Alaska articles
- GA-Class Mountain articles
- Mid-importance Mountain articles
- All WikiProject Mountains pages