Talk:Mount Blum

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.

Geology

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The rock is granite and it's only 15,000 years old? That seems implausible to me, though I'm not a geologist. I don't see how granite (a plutonic rock, formed deep underground) would be brought to the surface, exposed, and formed into a mountain that quickly. I'd love to see a citation. 206.208.105.129 (talk) 18:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mount Blum/CommentsTalk:Mount Blum/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The elevation, latitude and longitude do not match the values from reference 2. In particular, the longitude should be W (as in North America) instead of E (as in China).

Ref 2 gives 7638/2328 484514N 1212853W, instead of 7680ft/2340m 47°29′26″N 121°18′04″E.

Better now? Astronaut (talk) 20:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 20:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 00:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Geology

Assessment comment