Talk:MoEDAL experiment
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
references
[edit]Much of the content seems to be a straight cut and paste of the MoEDAL web page, which itself seems to be a cut and paste from another document.
http://moedal.web.cern.ch/content/search-pseudo-stable-massive-particles-smps — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.53.213 (talk) 23:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
MOS:BADEMPHASIS
[edit]User:Headbomb apart from it being ugly, the two correct styles to choose from my understanding that are commonly seen in use are bold for alternative titles, and italics for the expansion when not an alternative title. I copied the camelcase from a source to keep it as an alternative title, so bolded it. We're not meant to explain the acronym per MOS:NOBOLD Avoid using boldface (or other font gimmicks) in the expansions of acronyms
. Further, this double emphasis is also to be avoided by MOS:BADEMPHASIS Double emphasis, such as "italics in quotation marks" or italics and an exclamation point!, is unnecessary.
. Please can you reconsider. Widefox; talk 22:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Headbomb: (rare that I find myself pinging someone for two unrelated things). Widefox; talk 01:07, 30 September 2018 (UTC)