Talk:Missy Booth

Missy Booth has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 3, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

GA Review

Latest comment: 4 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Missy Booth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 17:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

"In order to" → "To" (less wordy)

Done – DarkGlow • 23:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Unsure on what to do" → "Unsure of what to do"

Done – DarkGlow • 23:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

"street wise" should be written as one word.

Done – DarkGlow • 23:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

"the ways in which" → "how" (less wordy)

Done – DarkGlow • 23:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sources are archived.
Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:45, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Some Dude From North Carolina All

Done – DarkGlow • 23:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

This page was redesigned at the edge.

GA Review