Talk:Missouri Route 162

Missouri Route 162 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 4, 2018. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / Missouri Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Types
	U.S. state highway
	Locations
	Missouri
	Notes and alerts
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

Missouri

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 8 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Missouri Route 162/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 03:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)

It is reasonably well written:
- Any info on when the diamond interchange at I-55 was built? And any cost there?
  - Cost added.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 06:23, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
- "and its section from Clarkton to Gideon was paved one year later." -- Any cost on this?
- As with Route 164, I can't immediately tell if the first sentence in the route description is a traffic count for this route. Is it, and if not can that number be found?
  - Fixed.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 06:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
- Finally, perhaps would be good to include if there are any landmarks or notable businesses on this one, or if it's an all residential road. I get it's a rural place but the information seems a bit basic as is now.
It is factually accurate and verifiable:
Pass Sources are largely maps, but not spotting any holes in citing. —Ed!^(talk) 03:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
It is broad in its coverage:
Pass No problems there.
It follows the neutral point of view policy:
Pass No problems there.
It is stable:
Pass No problems there.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
- No images here, technically possible but not feasible unless we had someone on WP living nearby, which isn't likely. Any chance for a map?
Other:
Dup links, dab links, external links and copyvio tools all showing no problems.

Source spotcheck Ref 7 and Ref 14 are appropriately referenced to the content in the article.

On Hold Pending a few fixes. —Ed!^(talk) 03:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Good work on this one! Passing for GA. —Ed!^(talk) 20:54, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

GA Review