Talk:Minster Pool

Lakes Mid‑importance

	Lakes portal Minster Pool is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Interesting historical point

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Might be worth discussing the case South Staffordshire Water Co. v. Sharman, [1896] 2 Q.B. 44, which is an important case, and one of very few common law cases on finders' rights. The court distinguished prior precedents holding that the finder of lost property retained ownership against all but the real owner when it held that the South Staffordshire Water Co., who owned Minster Pool and had hired Sharman and other workers to clean out the pool, was the rightful owner of two gold rings found in the mud at the bottom of the pool. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 20:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Interesting historical point