Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Minecraft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 28 days ago by MossW268 in topic "Markus and me" is not a grammatical mistake

Former good articleMinecraft was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 25, 2010Articles for deletionKept
October 7, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
January 15, 2013Good article nomineeListed
August 26, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
August 26, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 4, 2018Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 18, 2025.
Current status: Delisted good article

"Cat (Minecraft)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Cat (Minecraft) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 10 § Cat (Minecraft) until a consensus is reached. Whpq (talk) 13:13, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Outline article for Minecraft

Exactly what the title says. I propose having a separate article for a general outline of Minecraft. It will just have the main topics, like the people involved, in-game content, and general articles. There is a draft here, which I have created for this purpose.

Originally, I submitted this for review. But it since has been declined. I am opening a discussion for this topic, and hope to get more people interested in this! Thanks in advance! Wikiman (Talk) 20:09, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just would like to add a comment, I've added some links onto the draft to add more content to "warrant a standalone article of its own." I personally am all for it being published and am currently look for more links to add rn tbh :) Atakes Ris (talk) 02:56, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Atakes Ris Appreciate the help! Wikiman (Talk) 03:21, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Markus and me" is not a grammatical mistake

In the Music and sound design section, the sentence "That was just a complete accident by Markus and me" is marked as a mistake with [sic]. It is not a mistake, however, since "Markus and me" is an indirect object and not a subject. The [sic] should be removed. MossW268 (talk) 10:03, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply