Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot15:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Mark Feldstein (reporter) and Mark Feldstein (artist) different people
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
"After Roe" section of this article linked to the page of deceased artist/photographer Mark Feldstein. The reporter who won the Peabody Award for this investigative report is still living, according to his faculty bio at the University of Maryland. The Mark Feldstein referred to in this article appears not to have a WP entry, so I'm removing the link entirely. That said, the Washington Monthly article used as cite for most of this section is paywalled and the preview text doesn't contain whatever content is ostensibly supporting this section, so I'm only nearly 100% certain this is a correct edit and would appreciate review, preferably by someone with access to the full text of the cited article (which could use review itself, given it's supporting nearly this entire section). Bakemaster (talk) 21:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
