Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Micromollusc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Seperation in topic Citing for Micromollusks

Citing for Micromollusks

[edit]

Hi, I am a relatively new editor on Wikipedia but I have been active on Wikisource for about 4 years so forgive me if I don't entirely get the Wikipedia culture. This page (Micromollusk) is marked as needing citations, however, it cites the foremost paper on the subject talking about how to handle and process micromollusks. I am doing research on micromollusks for a class and thought I could lend some citations. I have been combing through the literature for this class already and while there isn't a lot of papers on the subject, this paper "Techniques for collecting, handling, preparing, storing and examining small molluscan specimens" which can be found here https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288605135_Techniques_for_collecting_handling_preparing_storing_and_examining_small_molluscan_specimens, collects all of the techniques tried and whether or not they worked by the top scientists in this field; Daniel L. Geiger, Bruce A. Marshall, Winston F. Ponder, Takenoru Sasaki & Anders Warén. So, I feel that much of this Wikepedia page can actually be referenced to this paper. I added a citation to a claim that was present in Geiger et al 2007 as well as other papers but I am unsure whether or not other people feel like more citations are needed.

TLDR: Should I add more citations to this paper to substantiate claims that are already covered by sources in the Further Reading section? Seperation (talk) 06:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply