Talk:Michael Reiss

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Ethics

(Random heading)

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

(Inserted by Said: Rursus (☻) 11:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC))Reply

The closing sentence looks weird and inappropriate to me:

"It seems that, in the context of value conflict in a multicultural society, Prof Reiss prioritizes liberalism's moral values over a (moral and intellectual) commitment to the value of scientific truth."

Even if I could parse any meaningful sense out of that, it strikes me as just one person's evaluation of Reiss' views, and looks out of place in a wiki article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.52.142.162 (talk • contribs)

True. Said: Rursus (☻) 11:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

(Random heading)