Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Menumorut/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by 3family6 in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 21:20, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    Prose is fine, no copyvios.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Layout and MOS policy is fine.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    Reference section follows a consistent format, citations filled out properly.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
    B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
    Accepting sources AGF as I cannot access them, and some are in Hungarian anyway.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
    C. No original research:
    All content is verifiable and attributable to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    All major aspects are covered.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
    B. Focused:
    Provides a lot of background content, but it is relevant, and the article is focused on the subject.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutral, no bias.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Quite stable. This is a topic where I could see nationalistic issues flaring up, but it hasn't had any problems of that nature.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    One image, File:Gesta hungarorum map.jpg, might be under copyright in the US, as the author died after January 1, 1923. However, use in this article could still qualify as fair use.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Images are relevant, and captions are appropriate.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall: Article checks out in all areas. Passed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
    Pass or Fail: