Talk:Menoky
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to caste-related topics in South Asia, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
untitled
[edit]Try to provide more information and references for the information that has been provided. Rohit Reddy™ (talk) 13:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Kshatriya refs
[edit]Currently four refs are given for the opening sentence, for which the word "Kshatriya" was restored. Presumably one or more of these are meant to support K. status:
- Fawcett (1990) Nairs of Malabar. Asian Educational Services. NewDelhi.
- Hermann Gundert. Keralā pazhama: antiquity of Kerala. International School of Dravidian Linguistics
- Edgar Thurston; K. Rangachari (15 November 2001). Castes and tribes of Southern India. Asian Educational Services. pp. 61–. ISBN 9788120602885. http://books.google.com/books?id=FnB3k8fx5oEC&pg=PA61%3C%2Fref%3E. Retrieved 10 June 2011.
- The Modern review , Volume 123, Issues 7-12, p.894
Fawcett and Thurston I can find online, and neither says any such thing. Do either of the other two substantiate K. status, and if so, how? Are they available online somewhere for reading? Given that Fawcett and Thurston are available online, why were their footnotes not provided with a link? MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:23, 22 July 2011 (UTC)