Talk:Maximum sustained wind/GA2

GA Review

An attempt was made to resolve the issues raised by the previous reviewer, so the article has been renominated. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I read closely, and I can find nothing that could restrict the article from reaching GA status. Although the article is a little short, I'm surprised at how much information you found on the subject. It passes. Congrats! Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 14:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)