Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Maximum length sequence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Dulciana in topic Incorrect polynomial?

Talk

[edit]

Hi, not sure one could say that the MLS "are" a polynomial ring ( I mean by that there is in the abstract a number of "they" and in my understanding the sequence is not a polynomial as is refered in the "polynomial ring" article. So I would suggest to replace that by "they can be derived" or that some characteristic of the sequence is related to a polynomial ring or such

Regarding the mention of fMRI in the introductory paragraph. The prior version referenced a paper from my laboratory that was not an ideal citation for the m-sequence page. I replaced the citation of my work with that of Buracas that is earlier and more appropriate to a discussion of m-sequences. -- Geoffrey K Aguirre 4/23/2010

Extraction of impulse responses

[edit]

This is very unclear. Maybe someone links to referenced material could be sprinkled in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon.irwin (talkcontribs) 18:59, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Info on generating the primative polynomials?

[edit]

It would be very helpful if info about generating the primative polynomials could be added here. For example can a computer algebra system like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PARI/GP generate them? If so, how? Woz2 (talk) 20:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Every binary sequence?

[edit]
   "they reproduce every binary sequence that can be represented by the shift registers"
   "for length-m registers they produce a sequence of length 2^m − 1"

These two statements seem contradictory, as a shift register of length m can represent 2^m sequences, not 2^m - 1. If I understand correctly, the all-zero sequence is never produced. It is easy to see if you try to start the recursion with only zeros - all subsequent register values will remain zero. 213.3.32.205 (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If the registers are initialised to contain any non-zero values, then the MLS will never produce a sequence of all-zeros. i.e., the registers will never be in a state where they all contain zeros.
So for registers while there are possible sequences, the one which consists of all-zeros is absent from the output of the MLS, leaving .
If the registers are initialised to all-zeros, then the MLS will only produce the sequence of all-zeros. Sawatts (talk) 11:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merge to Linear-feedback shift register

[edit]

First of all, I just changed the redirect for PN sequences to go to Linear-feedback shift register. Another pseudonym or synonym for LFSR sequence (besides *"PN sequence"*) is this page (Maximum length sequence).

"LFSR sequences", "PN sequences", "Maximum length sequences" (MLS), and binary "Galois fields" (GF(2)) are all about the same thing. While I certainly do not propose merging this with the Galios field page, the first three should be merged and presented in the Computer science or Electrical engineering context. Not in a pure mathematics context.

I am and will remain an anonymous IP. But will some Wikipedians with accounts join in this effort to fix this problem? Please discuss at the other talk page. 71.184.228.118 (talk) 03:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect polynomial?

[edit]

I'm not an expert, but it seems to me that the polynomial corresponding to the circuit shown in Figure 1 is x4 + x3 + 1 (not x4 + x + 1). Dulciana (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply