Talk:Max Roser

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peacocked

Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Similar to what has been said about Our World in Data, this bio seems to be biased and excessive in its praise for the subject. It contains excessive quotes from his work, from what other people wroe about his studies and awards. Wuerzele (talk) 23:32, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Fixed that now. The article is now rewritten for encyclopaedic tone. AsapLov (talk) 12:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

I wrote some of the text you deleted and I do not think it was biased or excessive at all. I only tried to express why his work is really important.

Your rewrite made the page more boring and I don’t agree with the deletion.

I would like to undo it, but I understand that it is not up to me and I will defer to the community. Ribalette (talk) 18:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Peacocked