Talk:Massive gravity
Add topic | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Lorentz violating massive gravity
[edit]Hello, I noticed that the page doesn't mention Lorentz violating massive gravity. I think it would be interesting to have a section about it. Yet, it is a relatively wide subject, so comments and contributions would be welcome. Thank you-Cosmichaloe (talk) 10:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
May be unclear
[edit]The article says " gravitational waves obey a massive wave equation ". This is unclear upon first reading. It sounds like it is a massive "wave equation", but isn't it actually a wave equation for massive particles? As it is written, "massive" is an adjective of "equation". Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:17, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
While I'm glad that someone decided to share the lit review from their PHD thesis, this article is vastly too technical for an encyclopedia entry
[edit]Please dumb it down for the rest of us. Gsm54321 (talk) 04:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Suggested addition of the work of Gambuti and Maggiore
[edit]This work by Gambuti and Maggiore https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10813 makes what I believe is an important contribution to the subject. (BTW I am a layperson, a mechanical engineer). The work presents a linearized massive gravity theory that is free of the vDVZ discontinuity of the classical Fierz-Pauli linearized theory (which founded the subject). Without the Gambuti and Maggiore (GM) work, one might believe that it is necessary to introduce non-linearity to resolve the vDVZ discontinuity Love equation (talk) 06:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)