Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Latest comment: 18 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
It is ridiculous to suggest that this article should be deleted because it is blatant advertising. I was the creator of this article more than a year and four months ago. In all that time nobody has suggested to me until now that there is any advertising involved. I have absolutely no personal connection with Malcolm Bishop. I have never met him or communicated with him. I created this article because he is an eminent lawyer.--Oxonian200616:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
I hope I have improved this article now. I have taken out everything that was merely copied from his commercial website and I have added important information about his having twice stood for Parliament and having apparently been at one time intended to become the senior law officer for the Welsh government.--Oxonian200616:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes, article now asserts notability more clearly and advertising elements removed. I have removed the speedy deletion tag Parslad17:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
I still don't see why this chap merits his own article. I have nothing against him personally, but there are about 1000 practising QCs, and many rather more eminent than Mr Bishop. What is it about him? Ironman110417:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
He is not just a QC. There are other reasons why he is noteworthy. The article is not asserting that he is particularly eminent but that he has notability. A person may be eminent but not notable.--Oxonian2006 (talk) 19:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
