Talk:MJET
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MJET article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Why have you changed "TEL. DESIGNATOR" to "CALLSIGN". The term Call Sign is described in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_sign. Quote: "By ICAO Annex 10 Chapter 5.2.1.7.2.1 - Full call signs type C, a call sign consists out of the telephony designator of the aircraft operating agency, followed by the flight identification." See also here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airline_call_sign#Call_signs_.28Flight_identification_or_flight_ID.29. I believe you should change the template Infobox Airline accordingly. It is not really correct to use the world callsign to describe a telephony designator.
Also regarding the subject template, not all the airlines have hubs ! An aircraft has a home base. But not all airlines have use the hub concept. In addition, a business jet operator is an air company providing ad hoc air transportation / on-demand basis. It is not an airline. You should create a new template for this type of companies. The.rud (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)