Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Lyman Viaduct

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 137.99.108.59 in topic The Famous Drawing is probably wrong?

The Famous Drawing is probably wrong?

[edit]

The drawing that is (correctly) cited from a dictionary shows a 'flat topped' trestle. However, the National Registry of Historic Places information on the viaduct as an architectural site shows a photograph of an excavated 'square/trapezoidal' truss. I'm not a civil engineer, so forgive my poor names for these structures and possible misunderstanding, but those images seem irreconcilable. I'm inclined to trust the photo on this, but I'm neither a historian, archeologist, or even habitual Wikipedia editor, so I don't feel comfortable putting anything in the article text. 2601:19E:427F:C7F0:8D3C:E3F3:8022:B4B9 (talk) 07:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

What you're seeing in the photos is the deck of the bridge, where the tracks would be attached. The viaduct is a deck truss, which means the trusses are located underneath the deck. So the tracks were at the very top of the bridge, meaning the drawing isn't necessarily wrong. I happen to be a civil engineer. Hopefully this makes sense. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I totally did not understand that without your explanation. Sorry for the erroneous complaint. 137.99.108.59 (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply