Talk:Lviv Metro

Is this necessary?

There are dozens of proposals, but is it necessary to include all of them. 2020 is a long way away, considering that construction has not even began yet, nor is there even a proper plan. In any case it is not even official. Do you mind if I afd it?--Kuban Cossack 19:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

It is official (the Lviv city council approved it), but do as you decide. I am not very experienced. --Seregelly ^talk 19:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

What exactly did they approve? At most it would be geological surveys, you can't begin to build or plan a metro without those and if they do take place this is something that has to be officially approved on state level. Only then can a Metro enter into a stage of "planning" which would mean that it probably will be built. Considering that Lviv is under a million population I heavily doubt that it would be even by 2030. In any case I know nothing of any geological surveys, so really this is just a empty article, as there is really nothing to write about... No offense, but there are dozens of cities on the ex-USSR that "officially" claim to have a Metro being developed with no work being carried out. --Kuban Cossack 20:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

As I said, do as you think...--Seregelly ^talk 15:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, if we decide not to keep it, then let's just redirect the article to Lviv#Transportation and write a short passage about the planned metro... —dima/talk/ 16:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

I think it is a very good idea! --Seregelly ^talk 14:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC)