Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Low-frequency oscillation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 186.80.58.84 in topic Image

Image

[edit]

That image corresponds to anything but a modern synthesizer. The control panel, the knob and buttons are very vintage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.80.58.84 (talk) 07:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Self-Referential

[edit]

"The abbreviation is also very often used to refer to low-frequency oscillators themselves, which produce the effects explored in this article." This has to be against the style guidelines, right? 70.161.101.249 00:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

samples

[edit]

"Such effects are difficult to describe, and are more understandable when heard." so some samples of different effects would surely be useful and not too hard to produce? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.167.107.251 (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dubstep

[edit]

I added a section in "uses" about the usage of LFOs to make wobble bass in Dubstep. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.33.151.78 (talk) 19:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oscillation vs. oscillator

[edit]

In my experience, it is much more common for LFO to refer to the oscillator than to the oscillation that it produces. Looks like there was at one point a move from Low-frequency oscillator to Low-frequency oscillation but I can find no discussion related to that. Perhaps someone would like to fill me in on the history here. --Kvng (talk) 14:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

That is my experience as well. If no one objects, and soon, I'd like to move this back to [[Low-frequency oscillator]]. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)Reply