Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Livonian War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Gawaon in topic cannibalism?
Good articleLivonian War has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 16, 2011Good article nomineeListed
January 25, 2011WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
April 11, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 12, 2011WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
May 29, 2011WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
June 1, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Efrom template generating "missing title" message.

[edit]

The {{Efron}} and/or {{Cite Efron}} template should be fixed to not generate the "missing title" message. User-duck (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Battle of Lode into Livonian War#1570–1577: Russian dominance and the Kingdom of Livonia

[edit]

Unneeded CFORK.  // Timothy :: talk  10:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Timothy : The article has been rewritten, improved and properly referenced by Gvssy. Can we get rid of the "Merge to" and "more footnotes" notifications now? Imonoz (talk) 23:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
User Timothy has seemingly retired; I'm removing them. Imonoz (talk) 17:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Revert?

[edit]

@Gawaon: Don't want to start an edit war, so writing this here. This information that you reverted is mentioned in detail in the Nikon Chronicle; and it is not secret or unknown information in Russian historiography. But since it is not desirable to cite a centuries old chronicle, I cited a secondary source. What's the issue with this source? Can a source not be RS if it's in Russian? Or is there a problem with the PDF format? I can cite more secondary academic sources,[1][2][3][4][5][6] but they are all, like most digital books, PDFs; and in Russian. Angel Eyes 💬

Something seems odd here, our article on the Nikon Chronicle says it "covers the years from 859 to 1520", so how can events that happened around 1560 be in it? Other than that, sources in Russian can sure be reliable as long as they were published by reliable publishers or in reliable journals, but it's hard for me to evaluate that, so I'll wait for what others here have to say. Plus if this is notable it should be mentioned in some RS written in English too, so the most accessible solution would be to find and reference those. Gawaon (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
It was originally compiled in the 1520s but later events were added. But you are right that we should not rely on primary sources. Kanklych Kanukov is briefly mentioned once in Ivan the Terrible: A Military History (2008) by Alexander Filyushkin on page 115, but this is referring to a campaign against the Crimean Tatars. Mellk (talk) 10:17, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Scholarship related to the Caucasus is simply mostly not in English. The vast majority is in Russian, or sometimes in Turkish. "If it's RS it should be in English!" is a misguided philosophy when working on obscure regional topics English scholarship has not touched. The sources I cited are mostly academic works published in the universities of the region who have their own branches dedicated to this field of research. Because frankly, only they really care about this field. Which academic in English is researching 16th century Besleney princes? It's all in Russian. Angel Eyes 💬 16:07, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
The sources do not have to be in English, but I think this is a question of WP:DUE. There are plenty of English-language sources that cover the Livonian War. Mellk (talk) 02:53, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. Pchelov, E. V. (2007). Кабардинская земля в царском титуле и русской государственной геральдике XVI – начала XX века [Kabardian Land in the Royal Title and Russian State Heraldry of the 16th – Early 20th Centuries] (in Russian). Nalchik: Издательство КБНЦ РАН. p. 86. ISBN 978-5-901497-32-6.
  2. Bgazhnokov, B. Kh., ed. (2008). Канжальская битва и политическая история Кабарды первой половины XVIII века: Исследования и материалы [The Kanzhal Battle and Political History of Kabarda of the First Half of the 18th Century: Researches and Materials] (in Russian). Nalchik: Издательство М. и В. Котляровых. p. 496. ISBN 978-5-93680-225-6.
  3. Kumakhov, M. A., ed. (2006). Адыгская (черкесская) энциклопедия (in Russian). Moscow: Фонд им. Б. Х. Акбашева. ISBN 5-99003-371-0.
  4. Khotko, S. Kh. (2015). Открытие Черкесии. Картографические источники XIV – XIX вв [The Discovery of Circassia. Cartographic sources XIV – XIX cc.] (in Russian). Maykop: ОАО «Полиграф-ЮГ». p. 292. ISBN 978-5-7992-0829-5.
  5. Abazov, A. Kh.; Anchabadze, Yu. D.; Kushkhabiev, A. V.; Pashtova, M. M., eds. (2022). Адыги: Адыгейцы. Кабардинцы. Черкесы. Шапсуги. Народы и культуры (in Russian). Moscow: Наука. p. 870. ISBN 978-5-02-040924-8.
  6. Khotko, S. Kh. (2017). "«Крымский аукцион» и судьба русско-черкесского альянса в первой половине 60-х гг. XVI в.". Вестник Кабардино-Балкарского института гуманитарных исследований (in Russian) (4 (35)). Nalchik.

cannibalism?

[edit]

There's a Wikipedia article about cannibalism in Europe showing a drawing of cannibalism during the Livonian War but there's no mention of it here. Was there cannibalism during this war? If so, why? ~2026-34784-66 (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The same image is present in this article as well, although such depictions were created for propaganda purposes. Mellk (talk) 16:02, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
If it happened, it was presumably due to hunger during the war. The caption mentions "hunger and pestilential trouble", and cannibalism during famine episodes is not exactly rare. My guess is that the depicted plate is based on actual accounts from the war (whether true, exaggerated, or fictitious), while the way it's depicted on the plate is due to the creator's imagination and shouldn't be taken too seriously. I'm not aware of reliable sources either confirming or rejecting cannibalism during the war, so I don't think there's much more we can write here without further research. Gawaon (talk) 02:39, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply