Talk:Live-In/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 20:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good.
• Change "which CBS intended to draw" to either "which CBS created with the intention of drawing" or "which CBS hoped would draw".

• Done

Premise and characters

• No problems here.

Production

• The reference right after "ELP Communications" is a citation to the first episode. This should be replaced with a secondary source.

• It is sourced directly from the episode's credits, which is consistent with WP:PRIMARY. Kind of like how music credits are sourced directly from the liner notes using cite av media. I have watched the episode myself so I know these are true.

• Same issue with the reference after "the Castle Bryant Johnsen-designed title sequence".

• Same as above; there isn't any mention in a secondary source but it is given in the credits, so the episode is cited directly.

• Remove the third reference after "Happy Together" per WP:OVERLINK and since it's a primary source.

• The first two references there cite the fact it is a cover of "Happy Together"; Ray Colcord being the composer is only mentioned in the third reference, which is in the episode's credits.

Episodes

• The notes after "Directed by" and "Written by" should look like notes (efns), and not like a reference.

• Converted.

• Additionally, the note near "May 8, 1989" should be lowercased per consistency with other articles.

• Done.

Broadcast and cancellation

• No problems here.

Critical reception

• Since its a new section, the entire name David Bianculli should be present rather than just his last name.

• Done.

• The sentence "because the rest is trashy" is not in quotes or in the clipping, so I would reword or remove it since it doesn't have the tone usually present on Wikipedia.

• It was an attempt at paraphrasing; removed.

Overview

GAN table

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Notes

• @Heartfox: This article is in great shape but could use some small adjustments. I have just finished adding most, if not all of my notes for this review, so feel free to add comments and message me back. I hope I can promote this article to GA-status really soon. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 16:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

• @Some Dude From North Carolina: thank you very much for your review. I have made edits to the article and have responded to your comments above. Heartfox (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)