Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses
The content of Doomsday List was merged into Lighthouse Digest on 29 December 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The Doomsday List is a feature of the Lighthouse Digest and it should appear as such in the article, within a subsection. On its own, this article has a weak notability case. According to point 4 (WP:MERGEREASON) a shared context like this one is a candidate for merger. Both are online, under the same site and editorial advisory. See here: http://www.lighthousedigest.com/news/doomsdaystory.cfm
Both articles are small, in fact, too small for their reach and scope. Separated they do not serve Wikipedia nor the preservationist community well. Together, they can even open space for similar lists, like the one for Puerto Rico’s lighthouses (published by the same digest). Caballero//Historiador☊18:27, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Done Klbrain (talk) 22:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)