Talk:Lightfastness
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by Mike Christie in topic GA Review
 | Lightfastness was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 11, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.png){kind=small}
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lightfastness/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 04:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
I'll review this.
- What makes printwiki.org a reliable source?
- The article should be structured so that the lead is an introduction and summary. Currently that's not the case.
- There's uncited material in the "In graphical industry" section.
- Some copyediting is needed. E.g. "When mixing the printing inks the lightfastness of the ink being weaker by its lightfastness defines the lightfastness of the whole color", "it can be expected to fade similar amount", "The following table is listing suggestive relations of the lightfastness ratings".
That's plenty to be dealing with. I'm going to stop there and wait for a response; I'll rereview once these points are fixed. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 04:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Aaaatu, are you planning to respond? I don't mind keeping this open if you need more time to work on it, but if I don't hear from you I'll fail it in another week. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've failed this as there has been no response. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)