Talk:Letters patent

Archives (Index)

1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

"Royla Letters patent" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Royla Letters patent. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 5#Royla Letters patent until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 23:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

"Judicial commission" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Judicial commission has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 25 § Judicial commission until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 03:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

There are some rather interesting claims made here

Please look at usage. It is clear what is being done with the subthematic simply not more than an interpretation as it is not a UK common law claim of admissible integrity for very clear reasons even if I personally agree with the current day overreach of the Prime Minister and his ministers as it starts to become its own form of a functionally quasi- unitary executive by fiat and non disclosure of strategic reality to the other members of the House of Commons which is different than making a legal theoretic sounding maxim of which no one who doesn't follow the UK would know about nor the situation currently bemoaned indeed by most all that I believe is the most distracting aspect of these sentences. Since they are not even meaningful by the standards of depth that don't require any formal legal or legal government doctoral level education to know are quite subtle about these matters. It's conventional law and thus isn't proper to use absolutist language in the very subsection which is the "technical" part as 'Usage' ~2026-26845-82 (talk) 01:51, 3 May 2026 (UTC)