Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crusades, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Crusades on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CrusadesWikipedia:WikiProject CrusadesTemplate:WikiProject CrusadesCrusades
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough (barely). Hook fact is cited and interesting, though of course the actual events were less interesting than implied. No close paraphrasing found; AGF on offline sources. Good to go! —Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:11, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
Article is new enough, long enough (barely). Hook fact is cited and interesting, though of course the actual events were less interesting than implied. No close paraphrasing found; AGF on offline sources. Good to go! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:11, 25 June 2025 (UTC)