Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Leopard Capital

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jessicaima in topic Comment

Comment

[edit]

I'm endeavouring to resolve the issues here raised, as of 3 July 2011. (Petersgoldpan (talk) 11:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC))Reply

I have deleted a small portion: "chenla seafood" in order to remove recent edits by a Wikipedia member who nominated the page for speedy delete. Chenla Seafood and Nautisco Seafood are unrelated. I have left in the controversy section - to comply with with WP:TONE and WP:NPOV — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessicaima (talkcontribs) 06:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of Interest

[edit]

This article appears to have a significant issue with conflict of interest. The primary editors are all employees of the firm and the article continues to be populated with WP:TONE and WP:NPOV issues. |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓTALK ◄| 15:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Parkview85 (talk) 13:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC) I think I have addressed the Tone and Npov issues to make is more neutral.Reply

The following editors appear to be WP:SPA with a distinct WP:COI in relation to this topic:

Leopard Capital

[edit]

Hi - the Leopard Capital article is the subject of a large number of edits in violation of WP:NPOV and the current status of the article is that is written like a WP:ADVERT. I have noted that the following editors all appear to be WP:SPA with an interest in Leopard Capital and its portfolio companies (ACLEDA Bank, Kingdom Breweries, Nautisco Seafood, CamGSM).

|► ϋrбanяeneωaℓTALK ◄| 12:52, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup

[edit]

There is certainly lots of issues with this article, I have improved on the it, especially to make it WP:NPOV compliant. I hope that other editors with keep improving on it to make it better. —JOHNMOORofMOORLAND (talk) 19:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply