Talk:Legendary Years
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 4 April 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 01:45, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Legendary Years (album) → Legendary Years – Unnecessary disambiguation. Gorobay (talk) 00:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Gorobay: "Legendary years" and "in legendary times" and suchlike are a feature of many fictional scenarios. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- The only other thing called “Legendary Years” I can find is an uncompleted section of Disney's Pop Century Resort. Is that worth converting Legendary Years into a disambiguation page for? If not I don’t know what you are proposing. Gorobay (talk) 20:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support move - At present, Legendary Years redirects to Legendary Years (album). I believe, that at this time, moving the sound recording to "Legendary Years" and adding a hat note at the top of the article will suffice. I just added a hat note to the top of this article. If there is a better hat note, I am all ears. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- The only other thing called “Legendary Years” I can find is an uncompleted section of Disney's Pop Century Resort. Is that worth converting Legendary Years into a disambiguation page for? If not I don’t know what you are proposing. Gorobay (talk) 20:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
"Article relies on single source" message
[edit]I noticed that there is a message at the top of the screen that the article relies on a single source, and while that's close to the truth (there's 3 sources), there also isn't a whole lot of information on the article: Only what it is (a compilation album by a band consisting of certain people) and what's on it (the track listing). There is no reason why a single source shouldn't be able to provide all of that; an official announcement of the compilation album would suffice for the information. So my proposal is to remove the message. 217.121.176.170 (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)