Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Laser Clay Shooting System

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by MuZemike in topic Working on a rebuild of the article
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 17, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that nearly all orders for Nintendo's Laser Clay Shooting System were canceled as a result of the 1973 oil crisis, plunging the company ¥5 billion into debt?

Working on a rebuild of the article

[edit]

I'm currently working on a rebuild of the article, which is going to include more extensive information on how the system worked as well as a fairly comprehensive history of the device; the information is coming from a book on Nintendo's history, which I bought not too long ago. I am also going to be removing the references to what seems to be mostly fansites, as much of the information I am seeing is coming from my book, which would be a bit more reliable.

However, I plan to remove the "Disambiguation" section, as the article needs to focus on the Laser Clay Shooting System in general and not the sport itself (there's no context there). Also, I am going to remove the "Trivia" section as many of the more reliable sources contradict what is apparently said in WarioWare: Smooth Moves that the system was made in 1977 (when it was in fact 1973). Finally, I am going to remove the references to Duck Hunt, as, from what I have researched so far, Duck Hunt was not a part of the Laser Clay Shooting System or "Mini Laser Clay", but instead it was part of the "Nintendo Beam Gun Series" (see Wired source), which was a separate project for home use (unless we should include that project in this article also, but I feel it might be better if we had two separate articles on that).

Hopefully, I will have it done by the end of the weekend and that it will be much improved from the current version. –MuZemike 21:08, 2 April 2011 (UTC)Reply