Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Larus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by MPF in topic Quirk of terminology

Commons

[edit]

I have been through all the species articles for this genus and all images are currently at Commons. Richard001 (talk) 06:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Norway or Poland

[edit]

Second picture says "in Poland" but the file descripription i s"photographed in Norway". Well?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.163.254.157 (talk) 18:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dealt with. • Rabo³04:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Interbreeding

[edit]

The report says 'However, the Lesser Black-backed Gulls and Herring Gull are sufficiently different that they cannot interbreed; thus the group of gulls forms a continuum except in Europe where the two lineages meet.'

This presumably is based in part on what Richard Dawkins wrote in A Devils Chaplain 'the Herring Gull and the Lesser Black-backed Gull never interbreed' and thus they cannot interbreed and thus they are sterile and thus this is evidence of speciation and thus sterility as a result of evolution. How false this is and another example of the scientific bias from our famed science community infatuated with evolution 'fact'.

Hopefully these sites which i just picked at random will help the reader see the light here ...

http://sites.google.com/site/appledorelbbg/

http://gullsofappledore.wordpress.com/

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119720150/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

http://machineslikeus.com/articles/SexualSelection.html

http://fdocc.blogspot.com/2005/10/gull-variation.html

http://darrennaish.blogspot.com/2006/02/no-no-no-no-no-herring-gull-is-not.html

But i see one of these is already referenced in your next comment - 'However, a recent genetic study has shown that this example is far more complicated than presented here, and probably does not constitute a true ring species (Liebers et al., 2004).'

How fortunate it is that at least one evolutionist is on the ball to try and cover his colleagues tracks a little.

But the damage is already done and it is further evidence wiki is far too reliant on such evolutionary bias.

Matt Cauthon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.14.49.156 (talk) 21:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quirk of terminology

[edit]

For me as a linguist it was fascinating to read this page and discover how closely these (sub?)speces are related, because I am aware of a quirk in the terminology. The German name for the lesser black-backed gull is Heringsmöwe, which literally means "herring gull". It's a classic false friend for language learners. Understanding that the taxonomy of these birds is in any case interwoven and complicated makes it a lot easier to understand how this could have come about. I will leave it to those of you who created this page to decide if that tit-bit belongs in the article. Doric Loon (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

A year ago I realise, but gull names between Latin, English, and other European languages are rife with false friends! There's lots of them . . . MPF (talk) 00:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply