Talk:Lammy Review
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by 2A00:23CC:E914:E801:D938:8FF8:1659:E1C7 in topic Article out of proportion to notability
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Article out of proportion to notability
[edit]The length and detail of this article is significantly out of proporition to the notability of the review. I think it's one of the examples where we need to remember what Wikipedia is not. The article seems largely a detailed synopsis of the review, which is not really encyclopedic. There are very few internal links to other articles and its hardly any references from other pages (it's got five articles linked to it.) There have always been very few editors. The whole thing needs a lot of editing and reducing in size. I'm going to give it a go.Seaweed (talk) 20:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Given the way that the hard-right have used lies, disinformation and hate to cause a new round of racism, violence and riots in places such as Essex, are not many of the findings within this report helpful and timely? If so, instead of cutting the report in size - should not any weaknesses be corrected? 2A00:23CC:E914:E801:D938:8FF8:1659:E1C7 (talk) 18:26, 31 July 2025 (UTC)