Talk:Labia majora
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depilation
[edit]Illustrative examples with normal hair would be more informative. Jack Waugh (talk) 00:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
The lead, and adding content
[edit]GregZak, I reverted you here (followup edit here) because the lead, per WP:Lead, is meant to summarize the article, not be bigger than article, and because Wikipedia is not a WP:Reliable source. You need to source your content with reliable anatomy sources. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Difference in picture
[edit]Extended content |
|---|
|
The male homologous organ is the Scrotum: And yet, both articles have totally opposite styles of pictures. A look at the talk page for Scrotum shows an intense debate over the nature of the lead image, with them settling on a diagram that rather frankly is confusing (as the Scrotum is primarily skin, something not shown!). That there is NO debate over the real pictures of female genetalia is suspicious! I think it is clear that the differences between these two articles in their choice of picture and abundance/lack of complaint is due to some form of sexist public bias that should be avoided. Unity between the two pages should be established. I personally think the Scrotum page should have a live picture as it is more informative. There is a good one listed in the last talk page. 90.242.136.228 (talk) 13:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC) |
- The page Scrotum seems to have had a photo on and off. Other than that, this is not really the page to argue "the Scrotum page should have a live picture". I am going to nominate this topic as an off topic thread. Wallby (talk) 11:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)