Talk:Kudrun
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Ermenrich in topic Improvements
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gundrun or Kudrun
[edit]The article is inconsistent in its use of this term and it makes it a bit confusing. I don't know which is prefered. . . John (Jwy) 03:16, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Improvements
[edit]This article, as it is currently written, is pretty terrible. It mixes in strange aesthetic judgments and is almost entirely without sources or inline citations. There is no mention of reception, interpretation, origins, etc. When improvements to the Nibelungenlied article have been completed, this will be an obvious next place to improve.--Ermenrich (talk) 19:15, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- C-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- C-Class Poetry articles
- Low-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles
- C-Class Literature articles
- Low-importance Literature articles
- C-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- C-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
