Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Justin Trudeau article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion. Explanation for inclusion in WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies: LGBT rights activistLGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles.
Latest comment: 3 months ago8 comments5 people in discussion
Previous editors didn't have issue with it until Moxy; Of note Moxy has been going across my edit history undoing random things without much or any explanation.
Per my edit, the polling was widely reported and relevant to the legacy section. The nuance of recency bias was also included. More polling will be done in the future surely, thus the section can and will be added to.
There seems little reason to delete a well sourced, compliant edit unless there is something I'm unaware of that editors have not yet raised. Abumoh00 (talk) 21:46, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
To put it simply, this content is just silly. People used to say Harper was the "worst prime minister" too. Now he's not so bad. I bet people will soon say Carney is the "worst prime minister". This is just not encyclopedic information no matter which way you spin it. Why do we care about this specific poll? What does it even mean to be the "worst"? The fact that no one is engaging with you on this should be a hint. I suggest moving on to something else. MediaKyle (talk) 13:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Carney was actually rated the best in the same poll. It's been a widely reported poll; the polling of prime ministers is highly relevant under a Legacy category. Future polls will be made and will be added.
If polls said that about Harper, that can be added to his page. I'm not an expert here; is there a reason it's not encyclopedic information?
The recency bias you noted was noted in the section.
I don't think we should select which polls we want to include vs. not; this introduces bias because some people will want to paint things more positively and some more negatively.
Please don't be mean or dismissive; no one in the talk page isn't automatically a sign everyone disagrees with me and I should be 'moving on to something else'. Abumoh00 (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
In 2012 we decide to put this kind of small statistical analysis about prime ministers in their own standalone article instead of overwhelming academic style articles with statistical junk. Would support addingl statistical info to Historical rankings of prime ministers of Canada. Think it's best we preserve the integrity of all the prime ministers articles by presenting this type of data in its own article instead of overwhelming each individual article with small statistical questionnaires..Moxy🍁19:43, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[Reply
I agree with MediaKyle. This is too ephemeral. People tend to have the worst possible view of a leader who’s just been dumped or defeated in an election, and to like a leader who’s just won an election. That’s why they got dumped or elected: because they were unpopular so got dumped, or popular so won. But that doesn’t mean people’s opinions right now are significant.
We have to remember what Wikipedia is not: not a newspaper WP:NEWS. As that section says:
“Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion …”.
This poll is an example of WP:RECENTISM. Polling about long term significance of something happening barely a year ago is maybe news, but not likely of enduring notability. Something may be published in a reliable source, but that doesn’t mean it’s of enduring notability. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh, one other thing, Abumoh00. Please don’t say things like “Previous editors didn't have issue with it until Moxy”. For one thing, the goal of consensus building is to criticize the posts, not the poster. Please don’t try to defend your position by making it personal against another editor. Second, so what if no one else commented until Moxy raised it? Just because no one else noticed the issue doesn’t undercut Moxy’s position. The fact that other editors are now agreeing with Moxy is an indication that Moxy raised a significant point, worthy of discussion. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:28, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Give how leaders can move in and out of office (eg see Britain), more than a year is not an ephemeral feeling; the recentism bias was mentioned in the text that was deleted nonetheless.
Given the breadth & extent of the negative economic metrics under Trudeau in comparison to his predecessors and now Carney, whether one attributes these to his government or not, I think its fair to say it’s unlikely his polling will change significantly in the next 5 years.
How long do we wait? 2 years?
Regarding pointing that out; apologies - I was frustrated Moxy was going across my edit history making what I saw as petty edits/undos - as mentioned in my edits. Other editors edited the new section, so I figured at least they looked over the polling section as they were added at the same time. Abumoh00 (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
The redirect Justintrudeau has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 19 § Alanturing until a consensus is reached. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 18:50, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
