Talk:Jura Foot Line
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Gestumblindi in topic "a windy single-track section"?
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Jura-Foot-Railway. |
"a windy single-track section"?
[edit]Wouldn't that be "a winding section"? --User:Haraldmmueller 17:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Good question. Both statements are valid from a language point of view, but mean different things. Windy would mean it was susceptible to high winds. Winding would mean it suffered from excessive curvature. If I had to, I'd guess that the original editor meant 'winding' rather than 'windy', but it is just a guess. A source would help, so I've asked for one. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 16:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's certainly rather "winding", I live near this line and know it. That's just my personal experience however, don't have a source right now. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
