Talk:John William Gott

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

John William GOTT?!? What a twist! :-D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.188.186.202 (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Request for Comments

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Last public prosecution"

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Of what? If it means blasphemy, the wording is redundant, but if the sentence means a full public prosecution, there are most certainly public prosecutions still occurring in the United Kingdom to this day (e.g. Crown Prosecution Service). Either way, the sentence is useless. 2A02:C7C:2DCE:1F00:BD43:90C3:995E:F31 (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

It was the last public prosecution for blasphemy. There were later private prosecutions. DuncanHill (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled

Request for Comments

"Last public prosecution"